I really don’t want to go back to work!

October 4, 2009 by The Ringleader  
Filed under Stuff

I’ve had two phone screens with companies near me, wanting somebody with pretty much exactly my set of skills.  In both cases I answered the questions easily, and the interviewer seemed both optimistic and interested in getting me in for face-to-face interviews.  Ugh.

It’s bittersweet; in the last month alone I’ve made more money playing poker than I’ve ever made as an employee in one month.  I understand that I’m running well right now.  I have no way of knowing whether this is sustainable.  If I had a 6-12 month track record of this kind of success I would feel a lot more comfortable, but even I know that statistically it’s unlikely.

It’s kind of funny – I had done well enough over the past few weeks that I’ve decided to spend less time playing and more time on other things.  I took about a week off, and then on Thursday decided I should go ahead and play one night.  I went to Snoqualmie and played in the 2/5 no limit game and ended up making just under $1000.  My weekly goal is $500 – and I doubled that in one night.  I promise I’m not saying that to brag – it’s nothing more than someone running good and trying to make good decisions.  And I’m a little surprised.  :)

So I have a pretty solid runway – I don’t need to take the first job I am offered – I never planned on doing that.  In fact, during both phone screens I made it clear that I would need to believe in what the company was doing before I signed on.  I wasn’t going to take a job just for the paycheck.  In fact, what I didn’t tell the interviewer was that I would be willing to take less pay for a job with a company that was doing something I believed in, over a job that paid more but didn’t bring something “good” to the world.

Anyway, I’m so close to my 20k goal – except I ended up using some of my bankroll.  Here’s the thing – in order to play 8/16 limit comfortably, I only need $8000 – which is 500 X 16, for 500 big bets.  That’s really where I spend most of my time, and intend to spend most of my time in the future.  I have more than double that in my bankroll, and because of that I’ve felt comfortable enough to play at the 2/5 no-limit tables a little bit.

So intending to stay above $16,000, I used some and bought some techie goodies for myself (a new netbook), and a birthday present for a friend’s daughter.  It feels really good to make enough money to both support myself, and also to have discretionary money to buy birthday presents and feed my geeky needs.  :)

I really like the netbook I purchased – it’s an HP Mini (I’m using it to write this blog entry).  I’ve taken it to Starbuck’s every morning to browse the web and drink coffee.  It’s tiny – 10.1 inch screen, and has no DVD or CD ROM drive.  The battery lasts 6 hours, and it’s portable enough to take with me everywhere I go.  Okay so enough about that – I’m still a geek at heart.  :)

So to round off this blog entry I’d like to explain a hand I played last week that I thought was fun.  ColdPlacePoker mentioned that he likes no-limit a lot more because you get to think about things like position and bluffs more – which I agree with.  Situations like this don’t often happen at the limit tables…

The maximum buy-in at the 2/5 no limit tables, at Snoqualmie is $300.  I actually like to buy in for $100, for two reasons:  first, I’m only risking $100.  If I bust out I can easily buy back in for another $100.  Second, I like to play a tight/aggressive game that is more natural for a short-stack.  Using this approach I tend to wait for quality starting hands and try to get all my chips in preflop or on the flop when I have a significant equity edge.  After that fate decides my success or failure.  :)

Anyway, I had bought in twice before this hand – so I was in for $200, and I had about $140 in chips in front of me.  A guy under-the-gun limps – he has about $2000 in front of him, and has obviously done really well.  4 other people limp in behind him, and I’m on the button with Ace, 8 suited (Spades).  I decide to raise to $20.  All limpers call, so there is now 6 people to see the flop with $120 in the pot.

I can’t say that I had a plan for what to do on the flop.  I had position, so I was going to make a decision after seeing what my opponents did.  That I had been the preflop aggressor meant they were likely going to check to me anyway to see how I react to the flop, so being in position may or may not help immediately.

The flop hit me pretty well:  4s, 6s, Jh

So anybody with a pair is ahead of me, but I have the nut flush draw.  To my surprise, the player under-the-gun bets $50.  The other 4 players fold, and the action is on me.  If he had something like Ace Jack, I’m almost positive he would have raised – I had watched him raise with lesser hands in that position.  Also, why wouldn’t he check to me, to see what I do?  It seemed strange for him.  He’s clearly not afraid of a raise, but if he had something as strong as a set he would want to trap me for all my chips.  It smelled a lot like a draw – could he have bet into me with a straight draw, something like 7-5 or 7-3?  He has enough chips to sneak in with something like that and bust a big pocket pair, which he might think I have.

So I have $120 behind, and there’s $170 in the pot.  Like it or not, I’m committed to probably getting all my chips in the pot – with such a strong draw, I’m not getting away from this one.  I’d love to take the pot right then and there, so I decide that there’s nothing for me to do but go all-in.

I shove, and he calls instantly.  The turn just happens to be the card I needed, the 2 of Spades, completing my flush – and as it turns out, also completing my opponents straight.  He turned over 7-3 of Hearts and I showed my flush.

He was good natured about it – he laughed and said he was happy to see the deuce, until he saw that it made 3 to a flush on the board.

Post to Twitter

  • Advertisement

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.